Tag Archives: keybank

Banks pull back on marketing spend in 2Q12

A scan of second quarter 2012 marketing spend data for leading U.S. banks revealed that most reported year-on-year declines.  These declines have been driven by both general economic uncertainty, as well as the fact that many banks have recently put ambitious cost-cutting initiatives in place.  Of the 12 banks studied, only four reported y/y increases in spending.  And Capital One’s spend excluding the impact of the HSBC card portfolio acquisition was also lower than in 2Q11.

The largest declines among the banks studied were at SunTrust and Bank of America.

  • SunTrust reduced marketing and customer development spending 30% y/y in 2Q12.  Its spend for the first half of 2012 was also down 30% from the same period in 2011.  In the presentation of its financials, the bank provided an update on its PPG Expense Program, which it expects to generate $300 million in annualized savings by the end of 2013.
  • Bank of America is following a similar a pattern, with marketing spend down 20% y/y in 2Q12, and down 19% y/y in the first half of 2012.  Like SunTrust, Bank of America devoted a section of its earnings presentation to discussing its New BAC cost reduction program, which has a goal of generating $5 billion in annualized cost savings by the end of 2014.

For other banks, the declines in 2Q12 follow significant recent growth in marketing spend.

  • JPMorgan Chase’s marketing spend in 2Q12 was down 14% y/y.  This follows a rise in 28% spending in 2011.
  • Citigroup reduced its marketing budget 6% in 2Q12, following a jump of 40% in 2011.

For some banks, marketing spend patterns can be related to timing of campaigns.

  • U.S. Bancorp’s marketing and business development spend was down 11%.  However, looking at the first half of the year, spend is up 22% over the same period in 2011).
  • Capital One actually grew spending 2% over the same period in 2011, and it reported that spending in the second half of 2012 would increase, due to the timing of some marketing campaigns.
  • KeyBank increased marketing spend 6%, which it attributed to a spring home equity lending campaign.

Finally, American Express reduced spend 3% y/y, but (at $773 million) its marketing and promotion expense still represented 10% of net revenues, a much higher percentage than at other leading financial institutions.  American Express’s goal is for its marketing and promotion expense to be around 9% of revenues.

Spate of small business lending commitments by banks

A meeting yesterday between Vice President Biden and 13 U.S. banks has resulted in a number of these banks announcing or reiterating small business loan commitments.  The banks include:

  • Chase: announced that it was on track to increase small business lending this year by 20% over 2010 levels, to $12 billion
  • Citi: committed to lend $24 billion to small business over the next three years ($7 billion in 2011, rising to $9 billion in 2013)
  • KeyBank: committed to lend $5 billion to small businesses over the next three years
  • M&T Bank: pledged to increase small business lending by $50 million over 2010 levels for each of the next three years

For banks, making such a commitment is important, as it acts as a rallying point around which resources can be concentrated.  Having a specific commitment also implies that the bank’s senior management has approved the objective, another key criterion for success.

However, announcing a specific lending commitment is only a first step.  For banks to achieve a small business lending objective, they need to design and implement an integrated plan that encompasses a wide range of activities, including:

  • Customer and competitive intelligence
  • Segmentation and targeting
  • Data mining
  • Product, service and offer development
  • Marketing communications
  • Merchandising
  • Sales channel optimitization (including structuring, incentives, training, and ongoing sales support)

In addition, these activities needs to be organized around customer needs and bank opportunities at various stages of the customer lifecycle:

  • Acquisition
  • Oonboarding
  • Cross-sell
  • Retention
  • Ongoing relationship development

For more insights in developing effective small business banking operations, see our white paper on The Transformation of Small Business Banking in the Thought Leadership section of the EMI Strategic marketing website.

Banks brand their cost-cutting programs

U.S. bank profitability in recent quarters has been driven by significant reductions in provisions for loan losses.  With these provisions now returning to normalized rates, and with revenue growth anemic, many U.S. banks are turning their attention to reducing noninterest expenses.  A number of banks now have branded cost-containment programs in place, including Project New BAC (Bank of America), Project Compass (Wells Fargo) and Keyvolution (KeyBank).

While some may see this as a cynical attempt by banks to put a gloss on an effort that ultimately result in lost jobs, from the banks’ perspectives, branding these programs serves to emphasize their commitment to cost containment with both external (investors and analysts) and internal (executives and other employees) stakeholders.

  • For investors and analysts, this commitment is seen in having a named program in place, with overall saving goals, specified areas where savings can be attained, as well as regular progress reports
  • For bank staff, the branding of such programs builds awareness, coordinates various cost-containment initiatives at the bank, as well as providing a forum for staff to submit cost-containment suggestions

Expect more banks to follow the lead of Bank of America, Wells Fargo and KeyBank.