If You Give An Advisor a New Business Model: Changes in Fee Structure Require Other Changes As Well

In a well-known children’s book called If You Give a Mouse a Cookie, a boy’s initial decision to give a mouse a cookie sets off a domino effect of one new requirement after another. It’s a great story about unintended consequences and the need to take responsibility for them.

The story is a useful lens through which to view the early momentum for moving away from an AUM-based fee to a recurring fee. Three recent articles highlighted this shift: two addressing discussions at LPL Focus (one from Financial Advisor and one from Wealthmanagement.com) and one sharing the results of a survey.

Without a doubt, recurring fees – and the steady revenue they produce – can be an attractive business model. Just ask Netflix or Salesforce. The appeal may be even greater if you’re an advisor whose primary alternative is a model in which you make less money when the market dives while you’re working even harder to satisfy clients who are unhappy with their portfolio losses.

But here’s the catch: You can’t shift to a recurring, subscription-like fee and still do the same things as before. Why? Because charging a monthly fee and delivering tangible value only two or four times a year means you’ll likely end up with unhappy and angry clients. Two totally unintended consequences.

If you decide to make the shift to a recurring fee, you also need to change two key elements: value delivery and measurement of client satisfaction:

Value Delivery. It’s entirely reasonable for a person who pays a fee every month to expect to realize value for that fee on a monthly basis. If Netflix didn’t spend millions of dollars on content and instead only offered old movies, you would cancel your subscription. If you could never get to the gym because you didn’t have time or there was a pandemic, you’d cancel your membership. Advisors have always had to face the question of “what am I getting for my money and is it worth it?” Under a recurring fees system, it’s even more important that the answer to that question is “yes”. Advisors need to ensure that they are explicitly delivering value to their clients on a regular, ongoing basis.

Client Satisfaction. If an advisor charges a fee based on AUM, it’s reasonable to assume that the client’s satisfaction will be driven by the growth of his/her portfolio. Shifting away from this fee model requires also moving away from the assumption about satisfaction. Portfolio performance will undoubtedly always be a piece of the equation when it comes to assessing the health of client relationships, but under a recurring fee model with ongoing value delivery, it can’t be the only piece. Client relationship health will increasingly be based on the frequency and quality of communications, the accessibility and easy use of technology tools, and the availability of ad hoc support and guidance.

The bottom line: People pay and assess satisfaction based on the value they receive. If advisors who shift to a recurring fee don’t acknowledge this reality of human nature, they will undoubtably face the unintended consequences of losing clients and referrals.

You Complete Me: How Marketing Can Boost Change Management Outcomes

In previous blogs, we highlighted six questions common to successful marketing and change management initiatives and common communication requirements across the five stages of audience journeys in adopting change. Now we want to go into the tactical implications of those communication requirements for change management.

There is a trope in love stories and RomComs of one character professing love for another through the words “you complete me.” Like many clichés, it has currency because it’s grounded in an experienced truth: In successful relationships, each partner possesses attributes that shore up weaknesses in the other so that together they are both stronger. That’s how it is with marketing and change management.

As we discussed previously, the similarity of the audience journey in the ADKAR framework to the customer decision-making journey is in the key communication considerations within each framework. Based on this foundation, marketing can help “complete” change management by offering communication best practices and ideas for each stage.

AWARENESS. Communications must highlight the need, bringing to light the pain that needs to be addressed. To be compelling, communication of that pain must be both credible and empathetic.

Examples of marketing communications at this stage:

  • Emails and presentations that explain the change in terms of its impact on all team members, coming from executive leaders
  • FAQs that capture and provide honest answers to real questions likely on the minds of team members

DESIRE. Communications must define the proposed change as the solution to the need, i.e., the best way to relieve the pain. To be successful, these communications must reach the “heart” and the “mind” of the audience by appealing to emotions and logic.

Examples of marketing communications at this stage:

  • Case studies of early, quick “wins” that highlight the benefits realized through the change
  • Infographics presenting the need for change and its potential benefits in simple, visual terms

KNOWLEDGE. Communications must create a solid understanding of the world after the change, in contrast with the current state. To be effective, these communications must make the case that the future state is close at hand and that the path to get there is very simple.

Example of marketing communications at this stage:

  • How-to videos and one-page quick-reference guides that make the path to implementation seem easy; brevity and visuals take priority over words and detailed use cases

ABILITY. Communications must minimize the perceived effort involved in change and reduce friction to take the first step. Successful communications at this stage offer a helping hand—not condescending but by providing clear, simple guidelines that encourage the audience to move down the path.

Examples of marketing communications at this stage:

  • Training materials and tools that provide comprehensive information about how to accomplish current tasks in the new state and instill confidence that change can be achieved
  • Gamification that turns mundane change into activities that confer status or create excitement for team members

REINFORCEMENT. Last, but definitely not least, communications must continue to celebrate the benefits delivered. Many change initiatives fail because they are thought of as a “one and done” proposition in which a single, intense effort suffices. Instead, the initiatives need to be promoted over an extended time period to bring along laggards and solidify the changes already made by early adopters.

Examples of marketing communications at this stage:

  • Success stories/testimonials highlighting the benefits achieved and improvements gained, not only in quantitative terms but in human, emotional terms
  • Awards to bring attention to change-driven achievements and, in the process, elicit feelings of aspiration and potentially competitiveness

Here’s the bottom line: if you’re not thinking about change management like a marketer and marketing like a change management leader, you probably missing something that could elevate the impact of your efforts.

It’s Like You’re My Mirror: Marketing and Change Management

In a previous blog, we highlighted similarities between marketing and change management and suggested six questions that can serve as a foundation for successful change management initiatives. Taking one step further, here we look at the similarities in the communication requirements of these two disciplines that will be increasingly critical in both the pandemic response and next phase of economic recovery.

In his hit song, Mirrors, Justin Timberlake sings of the way his love is  the other half of him, completes him, and supports him. The song is great, but its relevance here is in the way his words perfectly capture both the similarities between marketing and change management and the way that understanding those similarities can make each discipline better.

In change management, ADKAR is a widely known and respected methodology. The letters represent the journey through which change managers must guide their audiences in order to achieve the desired new state.

The value of a framework like this is that it identifies all of the moments in the journey that need to be accounted for and addressed through communications and training. It also enables a leader to think strategically about where the biggest risks and opportunities for influence lie. For example, if a company is introducing a new software application to replace a much despised legacy system, the opportunity to drive change may be greatest in the Knowledge and Ability stages: nobody needs convincing that the new system is better than the old but they may need extensive guidance on how to do their jobs under the new system. Conversely, the introduction of a new process for customer onboarding that is projected to save money and increase retention may require more emphasis on building Awareness and Desire if the current process, to those using it every day, doesn’t seem “broken.”

In marketing, the customer decision-making journey is often defined through the following stages: Problem Recognition, Information Gathering, Alternative Evaluation, Purchase Decision, and Post-Purchase Assessment. As with the ADKAR framework, this model enables leaders both to think carefully about each stage of the process and to identify the stages in which the flow is most at risk. For example, a new entrant to the CRM software market may need to invest heavily in the Information Gathering and Alternative Evaluation stage in order to gain consideration by prospective customers. On the other hand, a company selling a new kind of service connecting corporate art buyers and artists may need to focus on Problem Recognition to drive prospects to consider their solution.

Interestingly, when we line these two models up next to each other, it is, in the words of Justin Timberlake, like each is “lookin’ at the other half of” the other. More importantly, the alignment brings to light the key objective in each of the five stages.

A subsequent blog post will provide more guidance on how these objectives can provide a powerful foundation for devising more effective change management communications, but to illustrate the potential:

  • The objective to “highlight the need” drives home that the efforts to build awareness of the need for change must be from a credible source and be seen as empathetic.
  • The objective to “Envision a better world in which the need is resolved” makes it clear that any attempt to build knowledge of how to change requires that the “how” be seen as irresistibly simple and clearly puts the better, future state close at hand.
  • Focusing on the objective to “Make it happen” will ensure that assertions of the audience’s ability to implement will minimize friction and build confidence.