Author Archives: mronan

Leading U.S. Banks’ Commitment to Marketing Investment Continued in 2024

EMI Strategic Marketing performed a detailed analysis of advertising and marketing expenditures for c. 30 leading U.S. banks and found an 8% rise in spend in 2024, reaching more than $22.5 billion. Bank marketing spend was initially negatively impacted by COVID – falling 18% in 2020 – then it rebounded strongly by 26% in 2021 and 22% in 2022. The rate of growth has averaged 8% over the past two years, in line with a 9% CAGR since 2017.

The bank marketing ratio (advertising and marketing spend as a percentage of net revenues) rose by 22 basis points to 3.76% in 2024. This ratio has grown well above pre-pandemic levels.

  • Traditional banks are investing to build their brands to support expansion into new geographic markets and new financial categories and to counter the growing threat from fintechs
  • Digital challengers like SoFi and LendingClub have made significant investments in marketing to build brand awareness

The overall rise in marketing spending was driven by leading financial advertisers like American Express (up 18% to $6.3 billion) and Capital One (up 14% to $4.6 billion). Both banks invested more than 10% of their net revenues on marketing. They were among the five banks – including JPMorgan Chase (up 7% to $4.9 billion), Bank of America (up 2% to $1.8 billion) and Citi (down 4% to $1.1 billion) – that spent more than $1 billion in marketing in 2024.

Although Citi was one of several banks that reduced their marketing budgets in 2024, it is important to apply a longer lens to some of the banks. For example, U.S. Bank reduced its advertising and marketing spend from $623 million in 2023 to $503 million in 2024. However, since its annual spend was less than $400 million between 2018 and 2022, its 2024 spend represents its continued strong commitment to marketing investment. The chart below shows the change in advertising and marketing by banks between 2023 and 2024 and also includes marketing ratios as well as change in spend from the years 2019 (pre-COVID) to 2024. (The extent and timing of advertising campaigns can also impact overall spend levels from year to year.)

There is a significant difference in marketing ratios between different bank categories:

  • Card-Centric banks (e.g., American Express, Capital One, Discover) have high marketing ratios as they aggressively market credit cards (and in many cases personal loans) nationally.
  • Direct banks/fintechs (e.g., SoFi, Ally, Varo) need to build brand awareness in order to market their financial solutions nationally, and do not have the benefits – and the costs – of a branch network.
  • National banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America look to build their brand across the U.S., while also devoting marketing to support their branch presence.
  • Super regional and regional banks concentrate more of their marketing resources within their footprints.

For 2025, we expect that bank marketing spending will continue to rise, based on:

  • Strong macroeconomic conditions
  • Increased consumer and business confidence
  • Digital challengers building their brands to raise awareness and win share from traditional banks
  • Traditional banks investing in established and emerging marketing channels to thwart competitive inroads from digital challengers, support expansion into new markets, and make up for the scaling back of branch networks in existing markets

FDIC Publishes Detailed Branch Data: Key Takeaways

The FDIC recently published detailed branch and deposit data for different geographic levels for all U.S. banks. EMI’s analysis of this data revealed the following trends:

  • There is a continued (but slowing) decline in the number of bank branches. Over the past 10 years, the total number of domestic branches for FDIC-insured institutions declined by almost 24% to fewer than 78,000 branches. This equates to an annual average decline of 2.1%. In 2Q21 and 2Q22, the y/y rate of decline exceeded 3%, but this slowed to 1.7% y/y to the end of June 2023.
  • Some of the largest banks had the strongest percentage declines in branches. Our detailed analysis of 30 leading banks (see below) found a 3.1% y/y decline in branches (from 35,039 to 33,920) at the end of 2Q23. However four banks with networks of more than 2,000 branches reported declines of more than 4%: Wells Fargo (-4.4%); PNC (-6.7%); Truist (-5.4%) and U.S. Bank (-8.1%). Santander Bank reported the largest percentage decline (-8.9%).
  • Some banks are growing their branch networks. While the overall trend has been for banks to trim their networks, some banks are maintaining or even growing their commitment to this channel. TD Bank grew its network by 11 branches, adding branches in 8 existing markets, as well as opening its first branch in The Villages, FL. Following the collapse of its planned merger with First Horizon earlier this year, TD announced plans to open 150 U.S. branches by 2027 with a focus on Southeast markets.
  • Banks are maintaining their presence in the vast majority of their markets. While banks are reducing branch density in their existing markets, few are completely leaving these markets. Seven of the 30 banks exited a market over the past year, but only one left more than one market: City National Bank closed its branches in both Reno and Carson City, NV.
  • Branch closures were spread across many existing markets. Overall, the 30 banks closed branches in 22% of their existing markets, through several had higher percentages of existing markets impacted by closures, including Santander Bank (56%), Truist (39%) and PNC (32%).
  • Banks concentrated their reductions on markets with the largest branch networks. Banks reduced branch densities in many of their main markets, enabling them to cut costs while maintaining a significant presence. Although more than a third of Wells Fargo’s branch reductions took place in just 8 markets, each of those markets continues to have more than 100 branches.
  • Some banks are opening new branches in existing markets. The 30 banks increased branch numbers in 4% of existing markets, led by TD Bank (increased branch numbers in 14% of their existing markets) and Fifth Third (13%), who are both expanding their presence in key southeastern U.S. markets. JPMorgan Chase increased branch numbers in 22 markets (10% of its existing markets), including Washington (+11 branches), Minneapolis (+9), Kansas City (+7) and St. Louis (+7).
  • J.P. Morgan Chase is leading the way in market expansion. Over the past year, the bank opened branches in 10 new markets, including Buffalo and Virginia Beach (4 new branches in each market). This is part of a longer-term strategy to grow its branch footprint: the bank reported at its 2023 Investor Day that its population coverage rose from c. 60% in 2017 to c. 80% in 2022, with the bank now aiming for 85% population coverage.

Banks Trim Branch Networks, but See Branches as Vital in Entering New Markets

Recent data shows that while banks continue to cut overall branch numbers, they are also deploying their network across a broader geographic base. These trends are in large part due to digital channels now dominating for everyday banking transactions. As a result, banks are maintaining a less dense network of branches in existing markets; and they are opening de novo branches in expansion markets.

The following table shows branch numbers for some leading U.S. banks at the end of the first quarter of 2023, as well as net changes from 1Q22 and 1Q18.

Most banks have closed branches steadily in recent years. Wells Fargo closed 180 branches between 1Q22 and 1Q23,and 1,280 branches over the past five years (representing a 22% decline). U.S. Bank, PNC, Huntington Bank, Santander Bank and First Horizon have also cut their branch networks by at least 20% over the past five years.

Banks have indicated that they will continue to downsize their branch networks, but this does not mean that we are witnessing the extinction of the branch channel. Surveys show that consumers continue to value branches: in the J.D. Power 2023 U.S. Retail Banking Satisfaction Study, 38% of customers describe branches as essential. And banks see branches as a key channel for:

  • Branding and marketing
  • Customer acquisition and onboarding
  • Customer service
  • Local community engagement
  • Showcasing new products and technologies
  • Expert advice and support

What’s more, branches are critical beachheads for establishing a presence in new markets.

  • At its 2023 Investor Day, JPMorgan Chase reported that though it closed 22% of the branches in its legacy network between 2017 and 2022, 15% of its current branches were opened during the same period in new locations. It now has branches in each of the 48 continental states and 60% of the U.S. population is within a 10-minute drive of a branch (up from 50% in 2017. JPMorgan Chase is planning to grow its population coverage to 70% in the coming years.
  • Bank of America recently announced plans to expand its retail banking network into seven new markets, even as it cuts its overall branch count. The bank currently has branches in 83 of the top 100 markets and plans to expand that number to 90 by the end of 2025.
  • TD Bank announced plans to open 150 new branches by 2027, as it seeks to grow market share in south Florida, Atlanta and South Carolina.

In summary, trends in digital and branch channel usage create opportunities for traditional bricks-and-mortar banks to reduce overall branch numbers while expanding their reach into new markets through de novo flagship branches.