Category Archives: Retail Banking

7 secrets for smart use of gamification

Enterprise gamification — the application of social gaming theories and techniques in business environments — is taking off, with Gartner projecting that 70% of Fortune 2000 organizations will have at least one gamified application by 2015.  However, Upstream recently reported that, while 78% of marketers believe that customers are more likely to respond to game-based marketing, only 27% have actually deployed the strategy. Reasons for this disparity include a reluctance to embrace new technologies and processes, as well as the lack of a blueprint on how to create and roll out such programs.

However, we are now seeing a broad range of firms from many industries deploying gamified programs to educate customers, train staff, introduce new products or service, as well as building greater engagement with customers, prospects and employees.  Some recent examples of gamification in action include:

  • Health care benefits provider Aetna teamed up with Mindbloom to offer the premium Mindbloom Life Game to improve personal wellness for customers and employees.
  • Extraco Bank of Texas used the Bonus Banking Game to promote benefits and improve conversion rates for a new checking account.
  • GM’s Buick created a series of smartphone games to educate consumers on e-Assist, its fuel-saving technology.
  • Verizon Wireless gamified its online entertainment and lifestyle portal, Verizon Insider, which resulted in significant increases in traffic on the site.

Based on EMI’s experience in developing and deployment gamification programs for our clients, here are a few best practices to guide your success:

  1. Clearly define your game objectives, or you’ll find it gets lost in chutes and ladders. Articulate your goals and make the desired changes in customer/employee engagement measurable. And don’t limit yourself to education…product testing, employee recruitment and customer acquisition can all be addressed with gamification.
  2. Remember the technology baseline and limits of your audience. User experience is key to success; if your audience is all mobile, test on the full spectrum of devices and keep the real estate and graphic limitations of smartphones and tablets in mind. If you’re targeting employee audiences in locations far and wide, download speeds can be a limiting factor.
  3. Make it fun, but not too easy. Everyone loves to win, but make it too easy and boredom will drive users away. Make winning too hard, and the game will also fail.
  4. Positive feedback is required. Who doesn’t like encouragement? Let players see their wins early and you’ll encourage longer sessions, more attention and greater learning.
  5. Mix up the rewards. Choose incentives based on the desired behavior changes and their value to you, and use “soft” rewards like badges and leaderboards to increase ROI. Of course, real incentives like miles, points or virtual currencies up the ante.
  6. Ensure that players understand the ultimate aim of the game. Players may view the knowledge or experience they gain from the game as additional incentive to play. For instance, if the ultimate purpose of your enterprise gamification program is to enhance customers’ financial literacy, players may be just as motivated to play by the education they will receive as they are by the points they earn along the way.
  7. Keep score on user engagement. Get feedback from users on their experience, and use it to improve future programs.

Market-Specific Metrics Inform Bank Branch Network Investments

The emergence of virtual channels, the need to cut costs and speculation of more industry consolidation are all spurring banks to reconsider their branch networks.  Recently, EMI Strategic Marketing Inc. published blogs on the changing role of the branch, as well as trends in branch numbers for leading U.S. banks.

Banks have reiterated their commitment to the branch channel, but many are unlikely to maintain branch numbers at current levels.  Bank decisions of branch numbers and deployments are increasingly based on an analysis to the bank’s relative strengths in different markets.  Is the bank’s branch network spread too thinly, with few branches and low deposit shares in many markets?  Does it have critical mass in terms of branch numbers and/or deposit share in particular market? If it does not have sufficient scale at present, should it expand its branch network organically or through acquisition? Or should it leave some markets?

EMI Strategic Marketing Inc. analyzed end-2Q11 FDIC data on the branch footprint of the top 15 retail banks. (Note: this does not include M&A activity over the past year, such as PNC’s acquisition of RBC Bank.)  We focused on the number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) where these banks had branches, branch concentration levels, and market strength indicators.

  • The banks with the most extensive branch networks are Bank of America and Wells Fargo, who both have branches in more than 200 MSA markets.
  • Regional banks naturally have a more concentrated branch presence.  RBS Citizens, PNC and M&T all have more than 60% of their branches in 10 markets.
    • RBS Citizens has top-three share in only 14% of the 49 markets where it has a physical presence.  Recent speculation indicates it may sell off its branch network in Illinois and Michigan.  The bank has branches in seven MSAs in these two states, but does not have a top-three deposit share in any of these markets.
  • Market strength: Wells Fargo has a top-three deposit share in 70% of its MSAs.   Four other banks (M&T, Bank of America, SunTrust and PNC) are ranked in the top three in more than 40% of their markets.
  • In late 2010, Citigroup announced that it would be concentrating on 16 U.S. metro markets.  This helps to explain why 61% of Citibank’s branches are in just 10 MSAs.  On the other hand, it has five or fewer branches in more than half of its markets.  Given its stated objective to concentrate its efforts on about 15 metro markets, we can expect Citibank to leave many of these markets where it has a token presence.  However, it will be aiming to significantly grow share in its target markets.
  • Capital One, which has built a retail branch presence in recent years through acquisition, has 84% of its branches in just 10 MSAs. (In fact, 57% of Capital One branches are in just two MSAs: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV and New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA.)

Customers reducing branch usage, but some banks growing branches

Many recent surveys have pointed to customers’ reduced branch usage for everyday banking, as they embrace Internet and mobile banking. Many of the leading banks have reported very strong year-over-year growth in mobile banking active users in 2Q12, including Bank of America (+35%, to almost 10.3 million), Chase (+38% to just over 9 million), and Wells Fargo (+ 38%, to 8.3 million).  At the same time, many banks are implementing aggressive cost savings programs.

Based on this, one would expect banks to significantly cut back on their branch investment.  FDIC data bears this out, with total U.S. bank branch numbers falling by more than 500 in the year to end-March 2012.  However, the following chart reveals that this trend is not universal, with many leading banks increasing branch numbers over the past year.

While some banks (such as Chase) have grown their networks organically, the increase in branch numbers for most of the other banks listed above was a result of branch/bank acquisitions.

  • PNC grew its branch network following the acquisition of RBC Bank, as well as the purchasing of branches from Flagstar Bank.
  • Chase grew its branch network in growth markets like California and Florida.  However, it has scaled back ambitious plans to grow its network further in the coming years.  Chase has also radically expanded its Private Client locations, from 16 in 2Q11 to 738 in 2Q12.
  • KeyBank’s net increase of 14 branches was due to the acquisition of 37 branches in upstate New York, partially offset by branch closures.  The bank has reported that branch rationalization is one of the central elements of its new efficiency initiative, and it plans to cut 5% of its branches in the next 18 months.

Factors that impact bank branch numbers include:

  • M&A activity (highlighted in the examples above)
  • Strategic decisions to increase/reduce presence in specific markets (e.g., grow branch numbers in targeted markets, or reduce branches in other markets where the bank’s branch presence is below a minimum threshold)
  • Ability of specific branches to meet performance goals (e.g., growth, profitability)
  • Competitive activity

Though surveys indicate that branch usage is declining, a majority of consumers and small businesses still value branches, as they want a multi-channel bank relationship (encompassing physical and virtual channels).  This is leading banks to change branch design and staffing models in order to reposition branches to provide a broader role for the bank, in areas like selling, relationship development, product testing, and branding. (See our recent blog on the changing role of the branch.)