JPMorgan Chase commits to the branch network

About a year ago, Bank of America announced that it would close up to 10% of its branches in the next few years.  Some industry commentators interpreted this as signalling the demise of the bank branch.  In a previous blog, EMI argued that this was not the case, but that the role of the branch is changing, with other channels handling a majority of day-to-day transactions, and with branches increasingly used for complex transactions that require face-to-face interaction.

Banks’ continued commitment to the branch channel was highlighted in JPMorgan Chase’s Investor Day presentations this week.  Some branch-related takeaways from these presentations:

  • JPMorgan Chase opened 154 new branches in 2010, expects to open 225 new branches in 2011, and plans to add up to 2,000 new branches in the next five years (more that half of which are planned for its key growth markets of California and Florida)
  • Branches accounted for 35% of new credit card account production in 2010, up from 11% in 2006.  Branches are now Chase’s largest credit card acquisition channel

In addition, JPMorgan Chase has adapted to the changing role of the branch by hiring more sales specialists.  According to its latest quarterly financials,  Chase personal bankers rose 21% y/y to more than 21,700 in 4Q10.  Sales specialists grew 22% to almost 7,200.

As banks recommit to fostering long-term relationships with their customers, they see branches are playing an integral role.  From a sales and marketing perspective, key challenges include:

  • Ensuring that the customer experience is consistent across all service channels (branch, call center, online, mobile, etc.)
  • Changing branch layouts
  • Training and providing support tools to new and established branch personnel to adapt to the new role of the branch
  • Communicating the wide range of services available in branches to customers and prospects

Email Re-Engagement Strategy #1: Selectively Explicit and Implicit Preferences

In a recent survey of business executives, increasing subscriber engagement was the most frequently cited top priority—ahead of segmentation and social media integration. The focus on subscriber engagement has been rising over the last several years, driven by the growing role engagement is playing in email deliverability and by the recognition that one has to work harder to cut through an increasingly crowded inbox to affect the target audience. If recipients aren’t reading your emails, they’re not getting your message. Moreover, your emailing reputation will suffer and fewer of your emails will reach their intended inboxes.

Most “best practice” discussions around this topic advocate strongly for asking recipients to define their email preferences—the kinds of topics they’re interested in and the frequency with which they’re interested in receiving emails. Though this should absolutely be part of the email engagement approach, the reality is that for many B2B companies with small email lists, the decision to give people who are currently receiving emails (albeit not reading them) the option to refuse certain emails is an extremely difficult one to make. A compromise approach is one in which only those who are most at-risk of eternal inactivity are “invited” to define their preferences.

A complement to the explicit solicitation of preference definition is an approach that focuses on understanding what the recipient has responded to rather than on the fact that he/she hasn’t responded recently. For example, analyzing customer response data could reveal that a segment of “inactive” recipients used to respond with some frequency to a monthly newsletter; a reasonable hypothesis would be that they stopped paying attention to the newsletter because they couldn’t differentiate it from all the other emails they receive. In this case, testing the efficacy of sending them only the monthly newsletter would make sense. Likewise, looking back at how the contact got on the email list in the first place can yield some potential avenues for re-engagement: if they signed up to receive a whitepaper, it may be worth trying to limit them to only those emails offering a whitepaper download.

The point is that clearly your non-responsive recipients need to be re-engaged. Asking them what they want and responding to them offer two good options for resetting the communications relationship and gaining back their attention.

 

 

Bank deposit growth trends

American Banker (www.americanbanker.com, subscription needed to access) recently published end-second quarter 2010 deposit data for the top 200 bank holding companies in the U.S.  These top 200 banks grew deposits by 2.9% between 2Q09 and 2Q10.  This growth rate represents a slowdown relative to recent quarters, as many banks’ need to aggressively grow deposits as a funding source has abated (loan-to-deposit ratios have fallen below 100% and loan demand is expected to remain relatively anemic).  The top 10 banks grew deposits by 1.7%.

What is most notable in the data in the continued strong deposits growth rates for leading direct (branchless) banks, including:

  • ING Direct: 17th largest bank by deposits; 4%year-over-year growth
  • Charles Schwab: 25th largest bank; 43%growth
  • USAA: 31st largest bank; 17%growth
  • Discover: 33rd largest bank; 19% growth
  • American Express: 34th largest bank; 29%growth
  • Ally Financial: 35th largest bank; 31%growth
  • MetLife: 69th largest bank; 25%growth
  • Scottrade Bank: 105th largest bank; 71%growth