Iterate to success in B2B lead generation

Note: EMI will be presenting on this theme at the 2010 NEDMA conference.

There may be a world in which direct marketing lead generation budgets are expansive and resources are readily available, but it’s not the world in which most in B2B direct marketing live. In the B2B world, there are significant constraints—in the form of budget, time, and resource limitations—on the opportunity to conduct lead generation campaign tests with a multitude of cells. Yet, testing must be conducted for B2B direct marketing to realize its full value with respect to lead generation.

To make that happen, tests must be structured as an iterative process of continuous improvement rather than as discrete campaigns. The iterative process, simply put, is one in which smaller-scope tests are run on an ongoing basis with high frequency. Each test delivers learnings that can be applied to the next test to ensure continuous refinement.

To be successful, an iterative testing process requires discipline and patience. Specifically, it demands adherence to the following concepts:

  • Good testing = Focused testing. If you don’t have the resources, time, audience quantity, or budget to launch a 25-cell test, you need to keep your tests focused. Focus means limiting the variables being tested so that you can accurately ascribe results to a test criterion and only testing things that can be leveraged in future campaigns.
  • Data don’t tell lies (but we have to be committed to listening). In iterative testing, you must be open to finding insights in places you weren’t expecting to find them. Rigorous analysis of results across a variety of segmentation schema will often lead to the discovery of the needle in the haystack—a discovery that will save you the cost of searching for the needle later.
  • Optimization is a journey. You must accept the fact that you may never get to the point where you have all—or even most—of the answers. By the time you iterate through most of the relevant testing parameters, the audience and message elements may have shifted enough that you need to start testing all over again.

These three pillars of iterative lead generation campaign testing ensure that the approach produces both improved knowledge and increased lead volume. Without these pillars and the iterative approach, your lead generation structure is likely to crumble.

Direct banks continue to grow deposits

Direct banks continue to outpace bricks-and-mortar banks in terms of deposit growth.  These direct banks continue to aggressively promote high rates, and are also benefiting from consumers’ increased comfort with online banking.

USAA grew deposits 16% in 2009 to $33.5 billion

Ally Bank (a unit of GMAC) grew deposits 55% y/y to $30.0 billion at the end of 2009, based on offering high rates on deposits, strong customer services, clear terms and conditions, and a significant investment in advertising.

American Express launched its Personal Savings from American Express program in the second quarter of 2009, and this contributed to its U.S. retail deposits rising 70% y/y to $26.3 billion at the end of 2009.

–Like American Express, Discover has been on the hunt for deposits in order to create more diverse funding sources for credit card and other lending. Its deposits rose 114% to $14.8 billion at the end of 2009.

–Bucking the high-growth trend were ING Direct, which grew U.S. deposits by only 5% in 2009, having grown at very strong rates in recent years.  In addition, E*Trade Bank reported a decline in deposits in 2009, as it sought to reduce its balance sheet.

Going forward, the rate of growth in deposits for direct banks should moderate (with many of these banks having attained a critical mass of deposits that they can deploy to fund lending).  The focus for many direct banks will shift from aggressive deposit acquisition to customer retention as well as cross-sell of additional products and services.