Banks Cut Marketing Spending in Absence of Revenue Growth

EMI analyzed bank marketing data of 25 leading U.S. banks and found a 4% y/y decline in marketing expenditure for the first nine months of 2013.  During this period, marketing spending accounted for 2.6% of net revenues.

Our analysis finds that marketing expenditure levels and changes vary significantly by bank type .

  • Monolines: These banks are characterized as having a strong dependence on their credit card operations.  The three banks in this segment—American Express, Discover Financial and Capital One—allocated 7.8% of their revenues to marketing in the first 9 months of 2013.  Capital One’s spend levels are relatively lower, as it has transitioned over the past decade to be more like a full-service bank, with a network of 900+ branches.  The ‘monoline’ segment is also bucking the overall trend, with a 4% y/y rise in marketing spend.

  • National banks: These megabanks invest about 2% of revenues in marketing to promote their brands, support their extensive physical and virtual channels, and advertise their wide array of financial products and services.  As these banks (which include JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Bank of America) are under pressure to maintain profitability in a low/no growth environment, they reduced marketing spend 8% y/y.  Wells Fargo stands out, insofar as its marketing spend as a percentage of revenues is much lower than its peers, as it has traditionally focused its revenue-generating activities on its branch network.  However, Wells Fargo was the only one of these four national banks to report y/y marketing growth for the first three quarters of 2013.

  • Regional banks: The 18 regional banks analyzed by EMI allocated 1.6% of their revenues to marketing over the first 9 months of 2013.  Under pressure to cut costs and maintain profitability in the absence of revenue growth, these regional banks cut marketing budgets by 13%, led by large regionals like KeyBank (-31%) and SunTrust (-29%).

The extent to which banks ramp their marketing spend will be based on whether they see significant revenue growth opportunities, which in turn is dependent on economic growth.  And there are some positive signs in this regard, with the OECD projecting that U.S. GDP growth will rise from 1.7% in 2013 to 2.9% in 2014 and 3.4% in 2015.

Commercial Lending Trends in U.S. Banks’ 3Q12 financials

A noteworthy trend among large U.S. banks’ 3Q11 financials has been the significant rise in commercial lending. This continues a trend that has been evident in recent quarters. Of course, the current strong growth follows significant declines in commercial lending in 2008 and 2009 in the wake of the financial crisis.

Some of these banks have boosted overall commercial loan growth rates by targeting specific industry sectors. Comerica generated overall commercial loan growth of 21%, but grew its energy loan portfolio by 62% and its tech and life sciences portfolio by 36%. Other banks are following the industry targeting trend. Huntington recently launched a new energy lending initiative, and Associated Bank established a Healthcare Industry Banking Group.

It is notable, however, that uncertainty regarding the Presidential election and the looming fiscal cliff led to an overall 22 bps decline in y/y commercial loan growth rates between 2Q12 and 3Q12 for the 14 banks in our study, from 13.52% to 13.33%.

Although growth rates are robust, loan utilization rates remain relatively low, which can again be attributed to the economic uncertainty as well as many larger companies being flush with cash. The relatively low utilization rates indicate that commercial loans growth could accelerate once again if and when fiscal issues are resolved and economic confidence increases. And some banks are already seeing improved utilization rates:

  • Comerica’s utilization rate was 48.2% in 3Q12, having hit a low of 44.2% in 1Q11.
  • Regions’ utilization rate grew from 39.8% in 4Q10 to 44.4% in 2Q12.

Even as banks grow commercial lending, charge-off rates continue to decline. EMI’s analysis of charge-off data from 11 leading banks found an average commercial loan charge-off rate of 0.25% in 3Q12, down 29 bps year-over-year, and 11 bps from the previous quarter.

Finally, both low interest rates and increased competition continue to exercise downward pressure on commercial loan yields. Our analysis of yield data from 13 leading U.S. banks found that the average yield in 3Q12 was 3.81%, down 35 bps y/y and 19 bps q/q.

Banks Targeting Verticals to Drive Commercial Loan Growth

In recent quarters, most U.S. banks have been reported double-digit commercial loan growth, and most bank executives claim that commercial lending will continue to be a key driver of overall loan growth in the coming quarters. With so many banks targeting commercial loan growth, competition has increased, which is leading to declines in commercial loan yields.

To differentiate from their competitors and capture strong commercial loan growth opportunities, banks are increasingly targeting specific industry sectors. Presentations by leading regional banks at this month’s Barclays Global Financial Services Conference highlighted this trend:

  • Comerica is enjoying very strong growth in targeting two industry sectors: energy (loans up 68% y/y in 2Q12) and technology and life sciences (+36%).
  • Fifth Third’s deployment of a national healthcare team has led to a 40% y/y rise in outstandings. Specialized products include the RevLink solutions platform, which supports healthcare organizations in streamlining collections and managing costs, as well as improving liquidity and working capital. Over the past year, RevLink accounts have risen 30%.
  • Regions has five specialized lending groups headquartered in different cities throughout its footprint: energy in Houston, healthcare in Nashville, technology/defense in Charlotte, and both transportation and restaurant in Atlanta.
  • Like Regions, Associated Bank has an energy (oil and gas) group based in Houston.

Banks looking to pursue a vertical marketing approach need to develop a comprehensive understanding these industries in order to identify which industries to target, and how to do so. The following are some key questions that banks need to answer in this regard:

  • How many firms from specific industries are in the bank’s footprint?
  • What is the projected industry growth rate?
  • Are firms clustered in specific geographies?
  • What are current and projected levels of profitability?
  • Do these firms have unique financial needs?
  • What is the current level of competitive intensity? Do other banks have dedicated resources to target this vertical?
  • What is the customer decision-making process?
  • Does the bank have sufficient in-house expertise to effectively target and serve this vertical?